🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – seems like demands a PhD in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Expensive

Based on recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down due to partisan disputes over subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. How our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would need payments from employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker making average wages must contribute about five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you compare it to what average US resident spends. I can name multiple clients that are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, these contributions include pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection along with supporting medical services. When including those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like much of federal defense, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the program could be managed to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would render administration much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of going through the complicated (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding about benefits by our employees – contrasted with the current system where they have to interpret the complications of existing plans. And there would definitely exist less liability for employers as we no longer have access to workers' health histories for risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that government play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses which hire more than half of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes required, would remain a superior and more affordable approach both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places well below numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Maybe one positive aspect in this present circumstances could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that big changes are necessary.