🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “total contradiction” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Documents seen by journalists originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a draft bill that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on scented cigarette varieties, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

Over seven thousand citizens a year die from smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in circulation among community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during wider concerns about business sector influence with health policies. Recently, WHO officials issued a warning that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of industry lobbying worldwide. Tobacco company fingerprints are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN high-level meeting,” said Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and mandating that visual health alerts cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, BAT suggests this be reduced to 30% or 50% “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, delayed for at least one year after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. In the UK, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, claiming that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for different infractions “varying from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary claims the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but asserts that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The advocate stated BAT’s proposed changes would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that many such provisions existed in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We reside in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and collect the yield and market the products – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself absolute spiritual failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative said: “The corporation runs its activities following with applicable local laws. Additionally, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which allow for relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The corporation remained “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, mentioning that young individuals should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for evolving legislation to accomplish desired community wellbeing objectives, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” they said, mentioning that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the Zambian market and tobacco industry, which encompasses increasing amounts of black market activity”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.