🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an observance that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to address Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The tide has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the UK, Deutschland, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has developed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the observance is observed is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a good lesson in how co-option leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the warmer months we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels emboldened to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are expanding in Europe as a complete entity.

In the United States, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A effort to remove Black history and experience from the records is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the celebration symbolises how little it can be effective if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content celebrations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the realities of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its short period means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. A university professor, a prof at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just eliminate events including Black History Month completely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an time that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an foundation that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out across all seasons (as some institutions are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not evade politics, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What use is basic knowledge of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Organizations who celebrate it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and awareness of subtle slights, but confronted with the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.